By Oxana Bristowe
Gender Diversity. It's all over the news again: Insufficient women on the Boards of public companies. Men apparently being paid more than women for doing the same jobs...
But is it time to have a rather different conversation about gender diversity on Boards and in corporate executive management? Are we focusing too much upon external factors and not paying enough attention to the individual?
Why am I qualified to comment on this subject? One reason is that I am a woman. Another reason is that I have spent the past 15 years in the executive search industry working on appointments to Board and senior executive level positions for public and private companies operating throughout the world. In addition I have a very extensive network of women who are high achievers - senior corporate managers, Non-Executive Directors and business owners. I am also an entrepreneur, having my own company which I started two years ago with the goal of helping companies and individuals to become winners.
When gender diversity on boards was highlighted in the UK (Lord Davies report: "Women on Boards" 2011) I thought Norway's quota approach might offer a solution. Quotas would, it seemed, lead to a tipping-point at which a permanent shift in corporate culture, attitudes and values would be reached. The gender diversity issue would then fade into history as senior executive and Board roles were broadly balanced between women and men.
Inspired by that vision of the future I began to actively reach out to senior women and corporate clients with a view to having conversations about how I might help them achieve what would lead to change in senior management culture. And based upon independent research, company performances would improve. The government, the business community, experts and advisors - and of course women - were all saying the same thing: address the numerical imbalance using quotas, exhortation or carrot-and-stick, and the problem would be fixed. It certainly seemed that a very great injustice had been done to women, who were being denied a significant role and influence at the top level of business life. The lower percentage of women at the top of companies was generally assumed to be rooted in a biased culture of leadership, which seemingly consisted of men who were operating as if boardrooms were men-only clubs from some bygone era. Those men, it appeared, were somehow conspiring to keep women out of the boardroom. I think many articles and opinions on the subject still consciously or unconsciously reflect this "club" model of how boardrooms operate. I attended numerous female executive networking events and forums and became a mentor to one professional industry-specific organisation which is focused upon advancing the role of women. I wanted to contribute to and understand the issue in more depth.